The
Center for Women's Global Leadership at The 45th session of the
Commission on the Status of Women (CSW)
The
45th session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women
(CSW) was held from March 6-17, 2001, at the United Nations headquarters
in New York. The CSW prepares recommendations and reports promoting
women's rights and brings urgent problems requiring immediate attention
to the Economic and Social Council. Since the Fourth World Conference
on Women in Beijing (1995), the CSW has focused on reviewing the
implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action, each year examining
specific critical areas of concern. In addition, it reviews emerging
issues affecting women's lives and adopts resolutions on issues
of pressing concern to women.
This
year's CSW had an ambitious agenda and focused primarily on two
thematic issues: Women, the girl child and HIV/AIDS (in
preparation for the United Nations Special Session of the General
Assembly on HIV/AIDS); and Gender and all forms of discrimination,
in particular racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related
intolerance (in preparation for the UN World Conference Against
Racism).[1] The CSW
also sought agreement on the following United Nations documents:
- "The
Proposed system-wide medium-term plan for the advancement
for women, 2002-2005"(E/CN.6/2001/4), which reviews gender mainstreaming
in organizations of the United Nations system.
- "Recommendations
for enhancing the effectiveness of the working methods
of the Commission on the Status of Women" (E/CN.6/2001/8), which
examines the working methods of the CSW and seeks to make the
Commission more effective in formulating policies and in monitoring
the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action and Outcomes
Document.
- "Proposed
programme of work of the Office of the Special Adviser on Gender
Issues and Advancement of Women and the Division for the Advancement
of Women for the biennium 2002-2003" (E/CN.6/2001/CRP.2).
- "The
Multi-year programme of work for the Commission for 2002-2006"
(E/CN.6/2001/L.8), which outlines the themes and issues to be
addressed in future CSW sessions.
- "Resolutions
on the situation of and assistance to Palestinian women" (E/CN/.6/2001/L.2/REV.1);
"The release of women and children taken hostage, including those
subsequently imprisoned in armed conflict" (E/CN/.6/2001/L.3);
"Discrimination against women and girls in Afghanistan" (E/CN/.6/2001/L.5/REV.1);
"Mainstreaming a gender perspective into all policies and programmes
in the United Nations system" (E/CN.6/2001/l.6).
Given
how much was on the agenda, the CSW was not able to finish all its
work and consequently met in a resumed session from May 9-11, 2001.
During the May session, the CSW continued to work on the medium-term
plan, the proposed programme of work of the Office of the
Special Adviser on Gender Issues and the agreed conclusions
on Women, the girl child and HIV/AIDS.
For
more information on the resulting official documents, visit the
DAW website at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/45sess.htm
.
This
year, as in previous years, the CSW developed agreed conclusions
on the themes and emerging issues under review. Typically, the process
of developing agreed conclusions involves holding an expert group
meeting several months before the CSW session; and a panel with
presentations from governments, UN experts and members of civil
society, during the CSW session. After the presentations, governments
ask questions of the panelists and non-governmental organizations
make interventions.[2]
The panel discussion is intended to describe the issues and suggest
recommendations for action to governments and the United Nations.[3]
The agreed conclusions are to integrate themes from the expert group
meeting and the panel presentation and to compile actions for governments,
the United Nations and civil society to take on the respective theme/issue.
At
this year's CSW, the Center for Women's Global Leadership focused
primarily on the thematic issue of gender and all forms of discrimination,
in particular racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related
intolerance. TheCenter for Women's Global Leadership and the United
Nations Division for the Advancement of Women co-sponsored "A dialogue
on how intersectionality can be put into practice in the work of
the CSW." Panelists from five regions stressed both the importance
of understanding the structural causes of intersectional oppressions
and the need to consider the impacts of these oppressions on women
across the life cycle. They pointed to specific problems like those
of women asylum seekers, migrants and the frequent connection of
their problems to violence against women. The panelists suggested
that the CSW develop a methodology for intersectional analysis and
provide leadership broadly to other United Nations entities in the
use of such a methodology. Another area of Center activity at the
CSW was NGO participation in the World Conference Against Racism
processes. The Center co-sponsored a women's human rights caucus
discussing how NGO participation can be substantive and enable the
participation of racial, ethnic, immigrant, refugee, Dalit, indigenous
women and women from other minorities. The importance of youth participation
was also emphasized.
The
Center, along with other women's human rights colleagues, advocated
that there were two key issues the CSW needed to address: first,
the recognition and integration of an 'intersectional analysis'
and its application to all of the work of the CSW, and second, to
make strong recommendations to the United Nations Office of the
High Commissioner for Human Rights for preparations and outcomes
for the World Conference Against Racism.[4]
We stressed that the issues of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia
and related intolerances and the intersection of these human rights
violations with other forms of violation that women experience should
not just be a one year theme for the work of the Commission.[5]
Rather, an intersectional approach should be incorporated into the
Commission's permanent pattern of work, in order to enhance its
ability to monitor better the implementation of the commitments
of the Beijing Platform for Action and the Outcome Document, as
well as the implementation of the commitments made at all the other
world conferences of the 1990's. Therefore, the Center advocated
the inclusion of an intersectional analysis as a permanent methodological
component of the work of the CSW.
To
implement this approach, women called for the inclusion of intersectionality
in the CSW's Multi-year programme of work (E/CN.6/2001/L.8)and
the working methods documents (E/CN.6/2001/8). However,
the final resolution on the Multi-year programme of work does not
contain any reference to intersectionality and discussion on the
working methods document has been postponed until the CSW 2002.
In the 46th session of the CSW in 2002, there are two important
themes which still need to be introduced to strengthen the working
methods document: a call for an intersectional analysis and the
development of language for an intersectional methodology and the
integration of NGOs into the work of the CSW.
After
much effort by many women's NGOs, not only at the CSW but also at
the various preparatory meetings for the World Conference against
Racism, the CSW Agreed Conclusions on Gender and All Forms of Discrimination,
in Particular Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related
Intolerance recognized that women experience intersectional discrimination.
They go beyond the language in the Convention on the Elimination
of Racial Discrimination (CERD) General Recommendation 25, which
simply addresses the gender related dimensions of racial discrimination,
by highlighting how various forms of discrimination overlap and
shape one another. The agreed conclusions also recognize the link
between intersectional discrimination and poverty, serious and infectious
diseases, violence, inequities in education, etc. While the agreed
conclusions call for the review of the criminal justice system to
ensure that women and girls can seek equal protection and shelter
under the law, the document does not address how intersectional
discrimination affects the human rights violations inflicted on
incarcerated women.
It
is also important to recognize the preceding work on issues of diversity
and overlapping discriminations that governments and women's rights
NGOs have forged through the UN World Conferences for Women and
the CSW. For example, the Beijing Platform for Action recognizes
that "women experience multiple barriers to empowerments and advancement
for factors such as their race, age, language, ethnicity, culture,
disability or because they are indigenous people".[6] The agreed conclusions on gender and race go one step further
and highlight that "gender discrimination may be intensified and
facilitated by all other forms of discrimination".[7]
However, the language suggests that the discrimination occurs for
women because they are women and that there are other additional
and varying factors, which contribute to and exacerbate discrimination
women experience. Unfortunately, the agreed conclusions read as
though only women experience intersectional discrimination, rather
than seeing this as a way of looking at many forms of multiple discrimination.
Furthermore, the document frames all women's oppression as discrimination
based on gender and does little more than add the notion of racial
discrimination and stir. In doing so, the CSW chose to keep the
focus on gender by using the words of intersection, while failing
to operationalize the concept. To date, we have not seen any non-gender
related reference to intersectional discrimination in a UN document.
Therefore, it is important that those working on the World Conference
against Racism remain vigilant and work to ensure that intersectional
discrimination is not institutionalized as a phenomenon that occurs
only in women's lives.
Furthermore,
while the agreed conclusions identify migrant, indigenous, and refugee
women, they fail to identify women in terms of their racial/ethnic
identities or to suggest any special measures to address their realities
beyond the generic, "address all forms of discrimination including
racial discrimination ". With regards to the recommendations by
the CSW for the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
Xenophobia, and related intolerance, we wish they went further.
The agreed conclusions do call for mainstreaming a gender perspective
in the preparations, work and outcome of the World Conference, as
well as the inclusion of women on delegations to the Conference.
For a number of years, women's non-governmental organizations have
been calling upon the United Nations and governments not only to
encourage and foster women's participation in meetings, but to facilitate
the participation of women who represent the full diversity of women's
lives. Women's groups have been stating that in order for policies
and programmes to adequately reflect women's diverse experiences,
diverse women need to be involved in the design and implementation
process. At this CSW, women's NGOs lobbied governments to use the
World Conference against Racism to set an example by encouraging
and supporting delegations that reflect the full diversity of women's
lives. While we appreciate the recognition of the need for women
on delegations, the agreed conclusions did not go far enough and
should insist that delegations participating in the World Conference
reflect the varying lives of women who are impacted by racism and
related intolerances.
Finally,
unlike previous agreed conclusions on other issues, the final version
of the agreed conclusions on gender and racism contains primarily
general statements, which recognize the need to examine the intersection
of multiple forms of discrimination, but offer no operative language
calling for concrete actions or commitments to providing resources
for implementation of this. Given that there was recognition in
the Beijing Platform for Action and the 23rd General Assembly Special
Session Outcomes Document that there are multiple forms of discrimination
which women experience, the CSW should have gone further. The agreed
conclusions do recognize the need to develop methodologies to identify
multiple forms of discrimination, but the CSW did not use this opportunity
to suggest components of such a methodology. The agreed conclusions
do not provide governments, the United Nations and civil society
with a methodology by which to undertake an intersectional analysis.
Much work has been done by women's NGOs on such a methodology, some
of which is reflected in the work of the Expert Group Meeting on
Gender and Racial Discrimination (Zagreb, Croatia, 21- 24 November
2000).
As
stated previously, the Global Center did not work on the agreed
conclusions on Women, the girl child and HIV/AIDS. We do know,
however, that the negotiations were contentious. In a year when
many are preparing for the World Conference against Racism, it is
disappointing that the agreed conclusions on HIV/AIDS fail to incorporate
the demands by women's NGOs and the Report of the Secretary-General
on thematic issues before the CSW (E/CN.6/2001/9) to address the
racial dimension of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
For
more information about our work during the CSW, please visit our
website at http://www.cwgl.rutgers.edu/globalcenter/policy/csw01/cswmarch01.html.
[1]Information about the United Nations Special Session of the General
Assembly on HIV/AIDS held in New York from June 25-27, 2001 can
be found at http://www.un.org/ga/aids/ . For more information
about the World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
Xenophobia and Related Intolerance to be held in Durban, South
Africa from August 31 to September 7, 2001, visit the official United
Nations website at http://www.un.org/WCAR/. Additional information
about the NGO Forum at the World Conference Against Racism, Racial
Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance can be found
at http://www.racism.org.za/. Information about
women's caucus activities for the WCAR can be found at http://www.whrnet.org.
[2] For reports from the Expert Group Meeting on The Aids Pandemic
and its Gender Implications (Windhoek, Namibia, 13-17 November 2000)
and the Expert Group Meeting on Gender and Racial Discrimination
(Zagreb, Croatia, 21- 24 November 2000) visit
http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/documents/index.html
[3]The panelists papers and the moderators summaries
for the panels on the two thematic issues of this year's CSW can
be found at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/45sess.htm
[4]For background papers on intersectional discrimination
and a methodology for intersectional analysis produced during the
CSW by the Center in collaboration with other women's NGOs see
http://www.cwgl.rutgers.edu/globalcenter/policy/bkgdbrfintersec.html
and http://www.cwgl.rutgers.edu/globalcenter/policy/csw01/csw01priority.html.
[5] For examples of lobbying documents used during this
CSW on these two themes see documents under Working Group on Women
and Human Rights at http://www.cwgl.rutgers.edu/globalcenter/policy/bkgdbrfintersec.html
.
[6] Beijing Platform for Action, paragraph 32.
[7] Agreed Conclusions on Gender and all forms of discrimination,
in particular racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related
intolerance, paragraph 5.
|